Volume Three
V3 Issue 1
Marijuana laws put pressure on prisons | Main Menu | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Archive | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Marijuana laws put pressure on prisons |
|
|
|
| Written by Dale Gieringer, Ph.D | |
|
While serious crimes go unsolved and unprosecuted, California has over 1,400 cannabis prisoners; more than 14 times the number for 1980. The state currently spends over $160 million per year to arrest, prosecute and imprison these offenders, with African-Americans being over-represented among them by a factor of five. The costs of cannabis enforcement are unduly inflated by the fact that minor but common activities, such as small-scale cultivation and distribution, are felonies. Simply downgrading them to misdemeanors would save the state’s taxpayers court and imprisonment costs. Similar laws have been adopted, in Alaska, Maine, Colorado, Ohio, Australia and elsewhere. A recent Evans-McDonough poll shows that 58 percent of state voters agree that reducing cannabis penalties is a good way to reduce prison crowding. Governor Schwarzenegger, however, recently proposed spending even more money on new prisons. He also proposes cutting Prop 36 drug treatment programs intended to keep offenders out of prison, and vetoed a 2004 legislative effort to improve access to medical marijuana.
You can let him know what you think online at www.govmail.ca.gov/ or by mail: Tell him it’s time to stop wasting taxpayers’ money imprisoning people for victimless cannabis offenses. How? By eliminating felony penalties for minor offenses, such as home cultivation, petty sales and possession of hashish. California NORML has recommended several concrete legislative decriminalization proposals to reduce the number of non-violent cannabis prisoners.
While “personal use” cultivation defendants can apply for “deferred entry of judgment” under PC 1000, this is subject to numerous restrictions and involves burdensome diversion and court costs. The present law is especially burdensome to medical marijuana patients, who, even though they are legally entitled to grow under Prop 215, are still often arrested and taken to court on felony charges, an expensive and harrowing ordeal. California could make small-scale personal use home cultivation a minor misdemeanor punishable by a fine below a certain threshold. This policy has been adopted in Ohio, Colorado and some Australian states. A more liberal approach was recommended by California’s Research Advisory Panel in 1990, calling for complete elimination of criminal penalties for personal possession and cultivation of cannabis. This is currently the law in Alaska. California could make other low-level cultivation offenses regular misdemeanors (punishable by possible jail time), provided they take place on property owned or controlled by the grower. This would create a useful distinction between small, private gardens and large-scale plantations that are currently being grown by organized criminal gangs on public lands, which are more properly treated as felonies.
Convictions for intent to sell account for the majority of the marijuana felonies that are currently crowding prisons. Many involve petty dealers, who are more commonly arrested than major traffickers. As a public nuisance, petty dealing is akin to prostitution, which is presently treated as a misdemeanor. Moreover, the personal stash of a heavy-consumer who keeps a few pounds on hand is often cited as showing an intent to sell. Downgrade minor sales to a misdemeanor or wobbler. This is presently done in the state of Maine, where sales of one pound or less, or cultivation of 100 plants or less, are punished as misdemeanors.
California could treat hashish like marijuana, at a ratio of 1 ounce marijuana = 1/4 ounce of concentrated cannabis. This would make possession of <1/4 oz hashish a minor misdemeanor, >1/4 oz. a regular misdemeanor, and in no case would it be a felony. California spends far too much of its resources imprisoning citizens for cannabis and victimless drug crimes, and should at least adopt proposals along these lines. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|